ESTELLE M BILECKI V DORIS MILLER
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
ESTELLE M. BILECKI,
UNPUBLISHED
December 20, 2002
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 237126
Macomb Circuit Court
LC Nos. 2001-003221-PH
2001-003222-PH
DORIS MILLER and JOHN MILLER,
Defendants-Appellants.
Before: Owens, P.J., and Murphy and Cavanagh, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendants Doris and John Miller appeal as of right the trial court’s grant of personal
protection orders (“PPO”) pursuant to MCL 600.2950a. We affirm. This appeal is being
decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
Defendants maintain that the trial court erred in finding that they had engaged in conduct
falling within that delineated under MCL 750.411h and thus the trial court should not have
granted plaintiff’s request for the PPOs. After thoroughly reviewing the facts presented, we do
not find erroneous the trial court’s decision to credit the testimony of plaintiff and her witnesses.
The evidence supports a finding that defendants engaged in repeated harassment of plaintiff and
her daughter and that this behavior caused plaintiff to suffer emotional distress. We therefore
find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision. See Thermatool Corp v Borzym, 227
Mich App 366, 372; 575 NW2d 334 (1998).
Affirmed.
/s/ Donald S. Owens
/s/ William B. Murphy
/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh
-1-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
