PEOPLE OF MI V KENNETH SLANEC
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
December 13, 2002
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 234047
Wayne Circuit Court
LC No. 00-004289-01
KENNETH SLANEC,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Owens, P.J., and Murphy and Cavanagh, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant appeals as of right his jury conviction for OUIL, third offense, MCL 257.625,
and driving with a suspended license, MCL 257.904. We affirm. This appeal is being decided
without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
On appeal, defendant argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel who
elicited damaging testimony as to his blood alcohol level, and admitted that defendant’s
testimony that he only had one beer was not credible.
A successful claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requires a defendant to “show that
counsel’s performance was deficient and that there is a reasonable probability that, but for the
deficiency, the factfinder would not have convicted the defendant.” People v Snider, 239 Mich
App 393, 423-424; 608 NW2d 502 (2000).
Counsel’s actions were part of a reasonable trial strategy of bringing the officers’ actions
into question. Counsel had no evidence that would allow him to effectively challenge the blood
alcohol tests. Instead, counsel elected to emphasize defendant’s condition to show that the
officers manufactured the crime by allowing an obviously intoxicated person to stay in his car
away from home with the keys in the ignition. This Court will not substitute its judgment for
that of trial counsel regarding matters of trial strategy, even if the strategy backfired. People v
Rodgers, 248 Mich App 702, 715; 645 NW2d 294 (2001). There is no showing that defendant
would have been acquitted but for counsel’s actions.
-1-
Affirmed.
/s/ Donald S. Owens
/s/ William B. Murphy
/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
