PEOPLE OF MI V FEDERICO VEGA-PUGA
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
October 31, 2000
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 222822
Van Buren Circuit Court
LC No. 93-008521-FC
FEDERICO VEGA-PUGA,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Griffin, P.J., and Cavanagh and Gage, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant appeals as of right from his sentence of twenty-five to forty years in prison imposed
on his plea-based conviction of second-degree murder, MCL 750.317; MSA 28.549. We affirm.
Following this Court’s vacation of his conviction of first-degree murder, MCL 750.316; MSA
28.549, defendant pleaded guilty to second-degree murder, MCL 750.317; MSA 28.549. The trial
court sentenced defendant to twenty-five to forty years in prison, with credit for 2,366 days.
Defendant argues that his sentence is disproportionate to his circumstances and to those of the
offense. People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 636; 461 NW2d 1 (1990). We disagree and affirm
defendant’s sentence. The key test of the proportionality of a sentence is whether it reflects the
seriousness of the matter. People v Houston, 448 Mich 312, 320; 532 NW2d 508 (1995).
Defendant’s minimum term of twenty-five years was within the sentencing guidelines, and thus is
presumptively proportionate. People v Hogan, 225 Mich App 431, 437; 571 NW2d 737 (1997).
The evidence showed that defendant argued with his uncle about a pickup truck, struck his uncle at least
twice with an aluminum baseball bat, and then strangled him with an electrical cord. No evidence
suggested that decedent struggled with defendant. The factors cited by defendant, i.e., his lack of a
prior record, his work history, and his young age, do not overcome the presumption that his minimum
term is proportionate. People v Daniel, 207 Mich App 47, 54; 523 NW2d 830 (1994).
Furthermore, defendant argues that his sentence is so grossly disproportionate that it constitutes
cruel and/or unusual punishment. US Const, Am VIII; Const 1963, art 1, § 16. We disagree. A
-1
sentence which is proportionate is constitutionally valid. People v Bullock, 440 Mich 15, 29-30; 485
NW2d 866 (1992); People v Terry, 224 Mich App 447, 456; 569 NW2d 641 (1997).
Affirmed.
/s/ Richard Allen Griffin
/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh
/s/ Hilda R. Gage
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.