IN RE GRAY MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of ARCINI GRAY, KALIUM GRAY,
DEVONE GRAY, and CHINA GRAY, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
November 30, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 216224
Washtenaw Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 91-019527 NA
KATHY GRAY,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
ROBERT FERRI, SYLVESTER ALEXANDER, and
WESLEY MAURICE JACKSON, a/k/a WESLEY
JACKSON,
Respondents.
Before: Whitbeck, P.J., and Gribbs and White, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent appeals as of right a family court order terminating her parental rights to the minor
children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i) and (g). We affirm.
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds f termination were
or
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent failed to show that termination of her parental rights was
clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re
Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not err
in terminating respondent’s parental rights to the children. Id.
-1
Finally, limiting our review to the record, respondent has not established any basis for relief due
to alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. People v Pickens, 446 Mich 298; 521 NW2d 797
(1994); In re Simon, 171 Mich App 443, 447; 431 NW2d 71 (1988).
Affirmed.
/s/ William C. Whitbeck
/s/ Roman S. Gribbs
/s/ Helene N. White
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
