IN RE LOIS NICOLE BROOKS MINOR

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS __________________________________________ In the Matter of LOIS NICOLE BROOKS, Minor. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED September 22, 1998 Petitioner-Appellee, v No. 207554 Wayne Juvenile Court LC No. 88-271063 DEBORAH VIOLA BROOKS, Respondent-Appellant, and SHERROD GUTHRIE, Respondent. Before: Hood, P.J., and Griffin and O'Connell, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to the minor child under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (i); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i) and (i). We affirm. The juvenile court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Although respondent-appellant failed to comply with one aspect of the parent/agency agreement, drug treatment, this was the most important aspect of the agreement and involved the primary reason that the child was made a temporary ward of the court. See In re Jackson, 199 Mich App 22, 27; 501 NW2d 182 (1993). Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights was clearly not in the child’s best interests. In re HallSmith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the -1­ juvenile court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the child. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5). Affirmed. /s/ Harold Hood /s/ Richard Allen Griffin /s/ Peter D. O'Connell -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.