Attorney Grievance v. Haar
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND * Misc. Docket AG No. 83 * September Term, 2021 v. PAUL SAUL HAAR ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Paul Saul Haar, to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law in Maryland for seven months, effective nunc pro tunc to March 24, 2022, followed by one year of probation with terms, it is this 22nd day of April, 2022 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Paul Saul Haar, be suspended for seven months, effective nunc pro tunc to March 24, 2022, for violation of Rule 1.15(e) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further ORDERED, that upon his reinstatement to practice of law in the State of Maryland, the Respondent is placed on one year of probation with the terms contained in the Probation Agreement. Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (ยงยง 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. 2022-04-22 12:37-04:00 Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk /s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
