Attorney Grievance v. Viladegut

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Circuit Court for Montgomery County Case No. 477327-V IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 54 September Term, 2019 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. ANGEL ARTURO VILADEGUT Barbera, C. J., McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Biran JJ. PER CURIAM ORDER Filed: March 1, 2021 Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (ยงยง 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. 2021-03-01 11:25-05:00 Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. ANGEL ARTURO VILADEGUT * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND * Misc. Docket AG No. 54 * September Term, 2019 PER CURIAM ORDER For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 1st day of March 2021 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Angel Arturo Viladegut be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Angel Arturo Viladegut from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Angel Arturo Viladegut. /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.