State of Maine v. Bruce Ouellette (Errata)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Errata. Go to corrected Opinion
Download PDF
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2019 ME 75 Docket: Aro-18-295 Submitted On Briefs: February 20, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019 Revised: August 13, 2019 Panel: ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. BRUCE OUELLETTE ERRATA SHEET The Court’s opinion certified on May 21, 2019, is revised to correct two typographical errors. The second sentence of paragraph 8 is revised to remove a duplicated word: . . . the Town’s decision to accept a deed of property from Ouellette in lieu of formal restitution constituted a “a bargain[ed] for exchange” that sufficiently compensated the Town. The last sentence of paragraph 16 is revised to add a comma that was omitted: Therefore, although section 2115-A(2-B) specifically authorizes the State to appeal from the trial court’s denial, in whole or in part, of its Rule 35 motion, to do so, the State must file a notice of appeal accompanied by a written approval by the Attorney General. The original decision on the Court’s website has been replaced with the opinion as revised.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
