Kenneth W. Ross et al. v. Acadian Seaplants, LTD. (Errata)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Errata. Go to corrected Opinion
Download PDF
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2019 ME 45 Docket: Was-17-142 Argued: November 14, 2017 Decided: March 28, 2019 Revised: July 11, 2019 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ. Majority: ALEXANDER, JABAR, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ. Concurrence: SAUFLEY, C.J., and MEAD and GORMAN, JJ. KENNETH W. ROSS et al. v. ACADIAN SEAPLANTS, LTD. ERRATA SHEET The Court’s opinion certified on March 28, 2019, is revised as follows to correct a typographical error in a parenthetical explanation to a citation in the third paragraph of footnote 10: Mitchell W. Feeney, Comment, Regulating Seaweed Harvesting in Maine: The Public and Private Interests in an Emerging Marine Resource Industry, 7 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 329, 343 (2002) (discussing the erroneous scientific principles upon which the Court in Hill v. Lord appears to rely, and noting that it “is now known that seaweeds do not receive their nutrients formfrom the soil, but from the surrounding water column [and t]heir only reliance on the soil is for anchorage purposes”). The original opinion on the Judicial Branch website has been replaced with the opinion as revised.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
