Akers v. Akers
Annotate this CaseTimothy Akers appealed from a judgment on judgment on the parties' cross-motions for modification of their stipulated amended divorce judgment entered in the district court. The court left primary residence of the parties' daughter with the mother, Jennifer Akers, during the school year and ordered Timothy to pay child support. On appeal, Timothy argued that the court erred in (1) weighing the evidence presented at trial regarding the primary residence of the child and (2) computing the amount of child support. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the trial court did not err in concluding that the best interests of the child would be best served by continuing primary, school-week residence with the mother and providing substantial contact with the father; and (2) Timothy did not preserve his second issue for appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.