State v. Archer
Annotate this CaseDavid Archer was convicted for attempted murder and elevated aggravated assault in superior court following a jury trial. On appeal, the Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the trial court did not err when it allowed the State's medical expert to testify regarding the factual and medical conclusions of another physician, who did not testify, that were included in the victim's medical records; (2) the trial court acted within its discretion when it permitted a witness to testify about threats Archer made prior to the attack; and (3) the trial court acted within its discretion when it declined to play for the jury the complete records of all of Archer's phone calls to his mother from jail after the State had played portions of some of the calls for the jury.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.