Hancock County v. Teamsters Union Local 34

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MAINE HANCOCK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. CV-09-67 1<Me ~ -- J-I A ¢ N I - :, ~ /_';;> ,­ ~ _.,'(> HANCOCK COUNTY Plaintiff V. TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 34 olblo Natalie Walker Defendant DECISION AND ORDER Defendant Teamsters brought a claim regarding overtime payment due to Natalie Walker under a collective bargaining agreement between the Plaintiff Hancock County and Defendant Teamsters Union Local 340. Plaintiff brought a claim pursuant to 14 M.R.S. §5928(2) [Uniform Arbitration Act], to stay an arbitration proceeding. That statute provides in part that the court may stay an arbitration proceeding commenced or threatened on a showing that there is no agreement to arbitrate." Counsel have provided a copy of the labor agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant together with supporting affidavits and documentation as well as written argument. This matter was orally argued on January 29, 2010. IJ ¢ ¢ ¢ Plaintiff submitted evidence that Natalie Walker was employed for less then six months at the time the alleged overtime pay was due to her. While the Defendant does not concede this point, it offers no evidence in opposition to the length of time this employee was employed. The Defendant argues that the language in the Municipal Public Employees Labor Relations Act at §962, definitions, requires an interpretation of the contract favoring arbitrations. In particular the Defendant relies on the language lJ(a)s used in this chapter the following terms 1 shall, unless the context requires a different interpretation, have the following meanings ... " Defendant argues that this language permits/compels the underlying contract to be interpreted in favor of allowing an arbitrator to determine if the term 'public employee' can be interpreted based on past business practice to have been amended to include a part time employee. The Court agrees that the contract between Plaintiff and Defendant that provides for arbitration (See Article 46), is predicated on and draws its meaning from the Maine Public Employees Labor Relations Law. That statute provides in short sentences that a part time employee is not a Public Employee, as that term is used in the Act. City of Bangor v. AFSCME Council 74, 449 A.2d 1129 (ME. 198:2). This Court views Defendant as not requesting an expansive interpretation of the language of the Maine Public Employees Labor Relations Law, but asking that it be re-written. It is for the legislature to provide the relief requested by the Defendant, not this Court. The Court is satisfied that the Plaintiff has met its burden of showing that there is no agreement to arbitrate because it has shown that the employee is not a covered Public Employee such that this dispute qualifies for arbitration under the agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant. The Motion to Stay Arbitration proceedings between Plaintiff and Defendant with respect to this claim is granted. It is ORDERED that any arbitration proceedings that have been commenced or are threatened to be commenced with respect to this claim are hereby stayed February 23, 2010 2 SUPERIOR COURT HANCOCK, ss. Docket No ELLSC-CV-2009-00067 HANCOCK COUNTY - PLAINTIFF Attorney for: HANCOCK COUNTY TIMOTHY A PEASE - RETAINED 11/09/2009 RUDMAN & WINCHELL 84 HARLOW ST PO BOX 1401 BANGOR ME 04402-1401 DOCKET RECORD Attorney for: HANCOCK COUNTY DEBRA REECE - RETAINED 01/12/2010 RUDMAN & WINCHELL 84 HARLOW ST PO BOX 1401 BANGOR ME 04402-1401 vs TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 340 - DEFENDANT Attorney for: TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 340 HOWARD REBEN - RETAINED 11/25/2009 REBEN, BENJAMIN & MARCH 97 INDIA STREET PO BOX 7060 PORTLAND ME 04112-7060 Attorney for: TE.AMSTERS UNION LOCAL 340 ADRIENNE COHEN HANSEN - RETAINED 01/08/2010 REBEN, BENJAMIN & MARCH 97 INDIA STREET PO BOX 7060 PORTLAND ME 04112-7060 Filing Document: COMPLAINT Filing Date: 11/09/2009 Docket Minor Case Type: OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF Event~s: 11/12/2009 FILING DOCUMENT - COMPLAINT FILED ON 11/09/2009 11/12/2009 Party(s): ~,COCK COUNTY ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 11/09/2009 Plaintiff's Attorney: TIMOTHY A PEASE 11/12/2009 Party(s): HANCOCK COUNTY MOTION - MOTION STAY OF PROCEEDINGS FILED ON 11/09/2009 TO STAY ARBITRATION, W/AFFIDAVIT OF CYNTHIA A. DE PRENGER 11/12/2009 CERTIFY/NOTIFICATION - CASE FILE NOTICE SENT ON 11/12/2009 11/23/2009 Party(s): HANCOCK COUNTY SUMMONS/SERVICE - PROOF OF SERVICE SERVED ON 11/16/2009 ON TEAMSTERS' UNION .... Page 1 of 3 Printed on: 02/24/2010

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.