State of Maine v. Soucy

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MAINE KENNEBEC, ss , , .; I'YI (1 .. . . . ,1 ,:.,:;:I ,..,';,,,.\?, :J!I: ;.,,u:\ COURT :l!ly 3 p 2: b b LL>&,J< . , a STATE OF MAINE > , -,r-,- I . ~ c IVW ~ o ~,/aa/ob / l7:lI$[ .$ ,-., i j I ' / I 7. v. SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL ACTION DOCKET NO. CR-06-48 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS JEREMY SOUCY Defendant The defendant seeks to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the stop of the defendant's car, the detention of the defendant, and the search of the inside of the car. The defendant also challenges the determination of probable cause to issue the search warrant if the assertions resulting from the allegedly illegally obtained evidence are excised from the affidavit. The defendant further challenges the determination of probable cause to issue the warrant because the prior criminal record of the informant was not included in the affidavit. For the following reasons, the motions are denied. FACTS On 11/28/05, a search warrant was executed at the Augusta residence of Christopher Sudsbury. Prescription drugs and cocaine were found as a result of the search. Maine Drug Enforcement Agent Lowell Woodman secured Mr. Sudsbury's cooperation in identifying h s source for the cocaine. He told the officers that he purchased the cocaine from "JJ", who lived off the Pond Road in Manchester. Mr. Sudsbury described exactly how to get to JJ's residence. Detective Bourque remained at the Sheriff's Office and began drafting an affidavit for a search warrant for JJ's residence. At the officers' request, Mr. Sudsbury made phone calls to JJ, which were recorded. See State's Ex. 1.l The two agreed that Mr. Sudsbury's "usual" two ounces of cocaine would be delivered by JJ to J & S Oil in Manchester and the two would meet there. The officers had a description of JJ's vehicle. Federal Agent Greg Bushey and Agent Woodman waited at J & S Oil. Kennebec County Deputy Sheriff Wchael Pion was stationed on the Pond Road in Manchester near a dirt road where JJ lived. Deputy Pion had been told by Agents Lowell Woodman and Barry Kelley that a large quantity of cocaine would be transported from a certain location in a newer model pick-up truck and that JJ, whom the officers believed to be the defendant, Jeremy Soucy, possibly would be involved. During his phone conversation with Mr. Sudsbury, JJ said he had been drinking. Detective Bourque instructed Deputy Pion to stop JJ's vehicle if there was a reason for the stop. Deputy Pion observed a pick-up truck traveling on Pond Road at a high rate of speed. The deputy observed the truck cross the centerline twice. Deputy Pion followed the truck, maintaining a steady distance between his cruiser and the truck and traveling at 55 m.p.h. The speed limit on this road was 40 m.p.h. Deputy Pion turned on his blue lights and stopped the truck at 12:57 a.m. on 11129105. See State's Ex. 2. Deputy Pion smelled the odor of an intoxicating beverage coming from the truck. Deputy Pion asked the operator to get out of the velucle and perform field sobriety tests. After the operator performed the horizontal gaze nystagmus, walk and turn, and the one-leg stand tests, Deputy Pion concluded that the operator was not under the influence. 1 Detective Bourque did not listen to the tapes of Mr. Sudsbury's phone calls to JJ before preparing the affidavit dated 11129/05. Deputy Pion summonsed the operator for speeding. The deputy called Chef Deputy Liberty and was advised to detain the operator because of the on-going drug investigation. Deputy Pion informed the operator why he would be detained. When he learned JJ's vehicle had been stopped, Agent Woodman traveled to the scene and arrived approximately 30-35 minutes after the stop of the truck. He determined to detain the operator, who was identified by Mr. Sudsbury as the defendant, because of the investigation. A canine unit was requested at 1:01 a.m. on 11/29/05. See State's Ex. 3. At least five officers eventually arrived at the scene after the stop. Trooper Greg Stevens has worked for the Maine State Police for eight years and has been a certified canine handler for five years. Trooper Stevens and his dog were certified in drug detection in November 2005 by the Maine Criminal Justice Academy. The dog is trained to indicate on specific, illegal drugs. When the dog smells the drugs, he is trained to sit and is then rewarded. The dog is trained not to sit unless an absolute h t is made, whch does not occur with trace amounts of drugs. On 11/29/05, Trooper Stevens and h s dog were called to assist in the stop of the defendant in Manchester. When trooper Stevens arrived at the scene at 1:36 a.m., he was told that the officers present already believed cocaine was in the vehicle but wanted the dog to walk around the truck. The dog made a full sweep of the truck and indicated on the driver's door only. After sitting, the dog tried to jump into the truck through the driver's side window. Trooper Stevens unhooked the dog's lead and gave the command to the dog to find the substance. The dog jumped in the truck and indicated on the center console in the front seat of the truck. Trooper Stevens told the other officers that narcotics were present in the console. Based on that information, Agent Woodman opened the center console and observed what he recognized as approximately two ounces of cocaine in a plastic bag. The substance field-tested positive for cocaine. Deputy Pion arrested the defendant. CONCLUSIONS Stop Based on the information provided to Deputy Pion and h s observations of operation, Deputy Pion was justified in stopping the defendant's vehcle because the deputy had "an articulable suspicion that criminal conduct has taken place, is occurring, or imminently will occur, and the officer's assessment of the existence of specific and articulable facts sufficient to warrant the stop [was] objectively reasonable in the totality of the circumstances." State v. Burgess, 2001 ME 117, q[ 11, 776 A.2d 1223, 1228 (quoting State v. Tarvers, 1998 ME 64, ¶ 3,709 A.2d 726,727. Detention The investigatory detention of the defendant by Deputy Pion was valid because he acted on the basis of specific and articulable facts that the defendant was transporting illegal drugs and the need for other officers involved in the investigation to travel to the scene to aid in the investigation. See State v. Allev, 2004 ME 10, ¶ 17, 841 A.2d 803,808; State v. Moulton, 1997 ME 228, q[ 10, 704 A.2d 361, 364. Search inside Truck The exterior sniff of the truck by the dog was permissible. See City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 40 (2000). Once the dog h t on the driver's side door, entry into the truck by the dog was supported by probable cause and was valid. See U.S. v. Thomas, 787 F. Supp. 663, 684 (E.D. Tex. 1992). Agent Woodman was justified in opening the console after the dog h t on that specific area. See State v. Gifford, 604 A.2d 45, 46 (Me. 1992); State v. Phaneuf, 597 A.2d 55, 57-58 (Me. 1991); State v. Dainneault, 2001 Me. Super. LEXIS 214, *8. Search Warrant The affidavit contains suffiaent facts to establish probable cause that "contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place" to justify issuance of the warrant. See State v. Crowley, 1998 ME 187, 3,714 A.2d 834,836. The defendant has not made a substantial preliminary showing required to justify an evidentiary hearing. See State v. White, 391 A.2d 291,293 (Me. 1978). The entry is The Defendant's Motions to Suppress are DENIED. Date: May 22, 2006 ~ustice, Superior Court STATE OF MAINE vs JEREMY M SOUCY 161 KNOWLES ROAD BELGRADE ME 04917 SUPERIOR COURT KENNEBEC, s s . Docket No AUGSC-CR-2006-00048 DOCKET RECORD DOB: 04/12/1976 Attorney: WALTER MCKEE LIPMAN & KATZ & MCKEE, PA 227 WATER STREET PO BOX 1051 AUGUSTA ME 04332-1051 RETAINED 01/12/2006 State's Attorney: EVERT FOWLE Major Case Type : FELONY (CLASS A,B,C) Filing Document: INDICTMENT Filing Date: 01/12/2006 Charge (s) 1 UNLAWFUL TRAFFICKING IN SCHEDULED DRUGS Seq 8541 17-A 1103 (1-A)(A) Class B PION / KEN 11/29/2005 MANCHESTER 2 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF SCHEDULED DRUG Seq 8565 17-A 1107-A(1) (A)(1) Class B PION / KEN 11/29/2005 MANCHESTER Docket Events: 01/12/2006 FILING DOCUMENT TRANSFER TRANSFER - - INDICTMENT FILED ON 01/12/2006 BAIL AND PLEADING GRANTED ON 01/12/2006 BAIL AND PLEADING REQUESTED ON 01/12/2006 01/12/2006 Party(s) : JEREMY M SOUCY ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 01/12/2006 Attorney: WALTER MCKEE 01/12/2006 Charge (s): 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT SCHEDULED FOR 01/27/2006 @ 8:00 01/12/2006 Charge (s): 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT NOTICE SENT ON 01/12/2006 01/24/2006 TRANSFER - BAIL AND PLEADING R E C W BY COURT ON 01/24/2006 RECEIVED FROM AUGUSTA DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NO: CR-05-2990 01/24/2006 BAIL BOND - $1,000.00 CASH BAIL BOND FILED ON 01/24/2006 Bail Receipt Type: CR Bail Amt: $1,000 Date Bailed: 11/30/2005 Receipt Type: CK Prvdr Name: JEREMY SOUCY Rtrn Name: JEREMY SOUCY Page 1 of 3 Printed on: 05/23/2006 JEREMY M SOUCY AUGSC-CR-2006-00048 DOCKET RECORD - 01/26/2006 MOTION MOTION FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/26/2006 01/26/2006 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/26/2006 01/26/2006 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/26/2006 01/26/2006 MOTION - MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/26/2006 01/26/2006 MOTION - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/26/2006 DISPATCH LOGS 01/26/2006 MOTION - MOTION DISCLOSE CONF INFORMANT FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/26/2006 01/26/2006 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/26/2006 01/31/2006 Charge(s) : 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT HELD ON 01/27/2006 NANCY MILLS , JUSTICE Attorney: WALTER MCKEE DA: EVERT FOWLE Reporter: PHILIP GALUCKI Defendant Present in Court READING WAIVED. DEFENDANT INFORMED OF CHARGES. COPY OF INDICTMENT/INFORMATIONGIVEN TO DEFENDANT. 21 DAYS TO FILE MOTIONS 01/31/2006 Charge(s) : 1,2 PLEA - NOT GUILTY ENTERED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/27/2006 01/31/2006 Charge ( s ) : 1,2 PLEA - NOT GUILTY ACCEPTED BY COURT ON 01/27/2006 01/31/2006 BAIL BOND - CASH BAIL BOND CONTINUED AS POSTED ON 01/27/2006 01/31/2006 MOTION - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/27/2006 02/02/2006 MOTION - MOTION TO AMEND INDICTMENT FILED BY STATE ON 02/02/2006 03/09/2006 HEARING - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SCHEDULED FOR 04/04/2006 @ 8:00 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 03/09/2006 HEARING - MOTION TO AMEND INDICTMENT SCHEDULED FOR 04/04/2006 @ NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 03/09/2006 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/04/2006 8:00 @ 8:00 NOTICE TO pARTIES/COUNSEL 03/09/2006 HEARING - MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY SCHEDULED FOR 04/04/2006 @ 8:00 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 03/09/2006 HEARING - MOTION FOR REL OF CONFID. REC SCHEDULED FOR 04/04/2006 @ 8:00 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 03/09/2006 HEARING - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SCHEDULED FOR 04/04/2006 Page 2 of 3 @ 8:00 P r i n t e d on: 05/23/2006 JEREMY M SOUCY AUGSC-CR-2006-00048 DOCKET RECORD NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL LOGS 04/04/2006 HEARING - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY HELD ON 04/04/2006 NANCY MILLS , JUSTICE Attorney: WALTER MCKEE Reporter: CASE ENOCH DA: ALAN KELLEY Defendant Present in Court 04/04/2006 HEARING - MOTION FOR REL OF CONFID. REC HELD ON 04/04/2006 04/04/2006 HEARING - OF DISPATCH MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY HELD ON 04/04/2006 04/04/2006 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE HELD ON 04/04/2006 04/04/2006 HEARING - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY HELD ON 04/04/2006 04/04/2006 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS SCHEDULED FOR 04/05/2006 @ 8:00 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 05/23/2006 MOTION - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY GRANTED ON 04/04/2006 S KIRK STUDSTRUP , JUSTICE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL TO GET REQUESTED INFORMATION FROM MSP CANINE UNIT OR MCJA 05/23/2006 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE WITHDRAWN ON 04/04/2006 05/23/2006 MOTION - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY GRANTED ON 04/04/2006 NANCY MILLS , JUSTICE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL PRODUCE LOGS IF THEY EXIST, FROM MSP AND KCSO 05/23/2006 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS HELD ON 04/05/2006 STATE WILL TRY STATE WILL 05/23/2006 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE DENIED ON 05/22/2006 NANCY MILLS , JUSTICE COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 05/23/2006 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT DENIED ON 05/22/2006 COPY TO PARTIES/COUNSEL A TRUE COPY ATTEST : Clerk Page 3 of 3 Printed on: 05/23/2006

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.