Ralston v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.
Annotate this Case625 So. 2d 156 (1993)
James G. RALSTON, M.D. and Evelyn Darise Ralston v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
No. 93-C-1519.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
October 1, 1993.
PER CURIAM.
Granted. There are genuine issues of material fact in this case such as whether plaintiff is in fact infertile, the cause of the infertility, *157 whether such infertility is a sickness under the policy, whether in vitro fertilization is a treatment, and whether the treatment was necessary or essential. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, as affirmed by the court of appeal, is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
