Henry Norris Williams, et al. VS The Dow Chemical Company, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT NO. HENRY NORRIS WILLIAMS AND BETTY WILLIAMS 2019 CW 1104 VERSUS AUGUST 21, 2019 THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, ET AL In Re: ExxonMobil Corporation, applying for District Court, writs, 18th Judicial Iberville, No. 74597. supervisory Parish of BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., McCLENDON, HIGGINBOTHAM, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ. STAY DENIED; WRIT DENIED. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981) (per curiam) are not met. VGW PMc TMH Penzato and Lanier, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part. We concur in the denial of the stay. However, we dissent and would grant the writ in part and reverse the ruling of the trial court which denied defendant's motion in limine seeking to introduce plaintiffs' pleadings as to Dow Chemical Company. A judicial confession is an express acknowledgment of an adverse fact. Dean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 51,243 (La. App. 2d Cir. 4/5/17), 217 So.3d 611. Defendant, ExxonMobil Corporation, should be allowed, subject to any other evidentiary limitations, to introduce plaintiffs' pleadings and/ or to utilize same in examination of witnesses, to the extent such pleadings constitute an express acknowledgement of an adverse fact. The jury can be properly instructed as to the appropriate burden of proof to be borne by the respective parties. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT OF FOR THE COURT
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
