Sasha Ricketson, Tina Ramus, et al VS Anita McKenzie, et al (2019CW1013 Consolidated With 2019CW1015)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT SASHA RICKETSON, TINA BEHALF OF MADISON XANDER RAMUS, ON BEHALF OF INDIVIDUALLY STEPHEN RAMUS, RICKETSON AND DANIELL DYLAN BERRY, AND ON ON NO. 2019 CW 1013 2019 CW 1015 AND BERRY BEHALF OF RICKETSON VERSUS ANITA MCKENZIE, FRANK, ROBERT ILLINOIS RAILROAD COMPANY, LOUISIANA PARISH AMITE STATE THROUGH TRANSPORTATION OF D. CENTRAL OF DEPARTMENT AND OF DEVELOPMENT, TANGIPAHOA, TOWN OF CITY CONSOLIDATED SASHA RICKETSON, BEHALF OF XANDER RAMUS, ON TINA MADISON BEHALF OF AND DANIELL DYLAN BERRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND STEPHEN RAMUS, RICKETSON ON WITH ON NO. AND BERRY BEHALF OF RICKETSON VERSUS ANITA MCKENZIE, FRANK, ILLINOIS RAILROAD PARISH In STATE THROUGH TRANSPORTATION OF D. CENTRAL COMPANY, LOUISIANA AMITE ROBERT OF DEPARTMENT AND OF DEC 0 9 2019 DEVELOPMENT, TANGIPAHOA, TOWN OF CITY Re: Anita McKenzie, Railroad Company; supervisory BEFORE: WRIT Town writs, Parish of WELCH, HIGGINBOTHAM, Tangipahoa, No. AND JEW TMH GH OF APPEAL, 4 L; DEPUTY FOR C E THE K FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT of 21st DENIED. COURT D. Robert Frank, Amite Illinois City, Judicial District 2016- 0001308. HOLDRIDGE, JJ. Central applying for Court,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.