State Of Louisiana VS Nicholas Chiasson
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF 2017 NO. LOUISIANA KW 1195 VERSUS NICHOLAS In Re: BEFORE: Judicial WRIT DENIED. and 97- 2612 ( relator' to a claimed 930. 8( A). 711 transcript does by of to determined has inmate the an State parole -" the to La. terms to eligible court or of of be did not R. S. the considered sentence. GH AHP OF APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT correct et a mandated relator' eligibility Once imposed by the P. 98), regarding of parole. an Boykin the was determines for 5/ 8/ La. court seq. an of Crim. Code years Parole err by denying TMH COURT two 15: 574. 4 Corrections to allegations b), sentence Therefore, addition, first 4)( does 98- 0256 ( In s that purposes La. See State, date parole for district The the Daley v. motion Parker, its by allegation sentence. a relief. 40: 967( B)( R. S. the in relator' eligibility. La. in untimely v. determined rel. certain curiam). support ex Relator" s a raised is per Department district illegal not pursuant the is 695 ( parole fulfilled court, also restrict See sentence. be State term postconviction 694, law Tammany, JJ. is nature for guilty it and See So. 2d promise St. of PENZATO, 32. So. 2d illegal not may for application art. 703 plead sentence, AND pleading' s See caption. 97), to claim s illegal its 11/ 7/ La. point A not induced was writs, supervisory Parish Court, HOLDRIDGE, HIGGINBOTHAM, substance for applying District 521, 898. No. not Chiasson, Nicholas 22nd he NOV 3 0 2017 CHIASSON an the s is inmate district whether the Accordingly, motion to correct
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
