Patricia Isaac VS BREC Foundation
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT PATRICIA ISAAC 2017 NO. CW 0840 VERSUS BREL In FOUNDATION Re: The NOV 2 9 2017 Recreation East Baton Judicial complained -of for safe Bufkin v. So. 3d La. is to show Isaac the East of Parish Baton of 19th Rouge, ordinary Park Commission LLC, Rodriguez 871 ( Patricia duty was Isaac, for the produce to Parish factual East support Parish of also 10/ 15/ 14), 171 2014- 1725 LLC, burden Defendant, of and See forward come the by owed the The curiam). the reasonably 1). La. Dolgencorp, v. per we that prudence, for 2014- 0288 ( So. 3d and and 966( D)( art. review, fact apparent P. also to and care and novo material Civ. Commission failed de a Code 152 a obvious JJ. Louisiana, Plaintiff, that was La. See CHUTZ, conducting issue of exercising Felipe' s Park and Parish genuine Recreation 11/ 14/ 14), the no Rouge. 851. to for for supervisory writs, McDONALD AND condition The Baton Court, After persons Defendant, East C. J., GRANTED. there conclude applying District WHIPPLE, WRIT Rouge, Commission 640555. No. BEFORE: Park and with The evidence Recreation Rouge. Baton to sufficient shifted Ms. establish that she will be able to satisfy her evidentiary burden of proof at trial with Lockwood, Accordingly, the the hereby of the Ms. dismissing Commission 156 the court claims writ 650 ( 13, June and The Allen per application on judgment, against See element. So. 3d signed summary Isaac' s for the essential 13/ 15), grant trial for motion this 2/ La. we judgment denied to respect 2014- 1724 ( v. curiam). and reverse 2017, which judgment render Recreation and Park Parish of East Baton Rouge with prejudice. JMM WRC Whipple, failed she will trial the to J., The factual support produce be that able the particular therefore, is Code P. Civ. FOR satisfy Defendant is no art. CLERK THE 966( D)( FIRST OF 1); actual prior La. Patricia to sufficient evidentiary issue judgment CIRCUIT COURT COURT had genuine to Plaintiff, her defect or entitled OF APPEAL, PUTY to vice there Defendant COURT concurs. as R. S. or to of a 9: burden of constructive the incident material matter 2800( C). of has Isaac, establish that proof notice at at of issue; fact, and the law. See La.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
