Rusten May, Bryan Boudreaux, John D. Lewis, III, Eric Jackson and Albert J. Walker VS Lane Carson, in His Capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs, and the State of Louisiana through the Department of Veterans Affairs through its State Director of Veterans Affairs, Bill Dixon

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT RUSTEN JOHN MAY, D. BRYAN LEWIS, JACKSON AND BOUDREAUX III, ALBERT 2017 NO. CW 0811 ERIC J. WALKER VERSUS LANE AS CARSON, IN LOUISIANA HIS OF SECRETARY THE DEPARTMENT VETERANS AFFAIRS, STATE LOUISIANA THE OF DEPARTMENT AFFAIRS CAPACITY OF THROUGH OF AND THE THROUGH VETERANS ITS STATE DIRECTOR OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, BILL In Re: ACT 0 2 2017_. DIXON David in LaCerte, Louisiana State Louisiana of Affairs through Affairs, Bill 19th BEFORE: in in GRANTED. Boudreaux, vacating Plaintiffs, v. 101, 689 citing So. 2d Indem. Ins. denied, 1986) . Parish Lewis So. 2d the 3/ 24/ La. 549 ( 1974) . La. 499 GH AHP FIRST CIRCUIT JEPUTY CLERK OF COURT THE COURT of Baton v. the January claims La. 733 3d App. 1211, 30, not Stell 1212 ( 2017 So. 2d Cir. 3d of Cir.), La. 100, 2/ 5/ 97), Accident v. move Guillory granted. Hartford and against did 99), Rusten Jackson, Eric App. Accord So. 2d district the Jackson, relief Cir. Abshire 545, TRH FOR East of Plaintiffs 96 - 1085 ( also Public Safety, the Accordingly, OF APPEAL, writs, Plaintiffs, and Eric error. App. the of III, and 3d ruling district court is hereby reversed and vacated. COURT Veterans JJ. dismissing orders Brooks, 170 ( 2017 30, request La. See 289 So. 2d of v. 547. Co., 293 Department Cir. Smith 544, Veterans of supervisory PENZATO, D. legal nor 98 - 1314 ( AND behalf May was judgment summary Court, on John Rusten Robideaux, January previous Defendants / Relators for HOLDRIDGE The its for the the and of Director applying of Affairs, Department the State District judgment granting Bryan May, through its Secretary as Veterans 624049. No. HIGGINBOTHAM, WRIT court Capacity of Dixon, Judicial Rouge, his Department and writ Louisiana App. 5th of the ruling

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.