State Of Louisiana VS David Scott Temple
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 2016 NO. Kw 0713 VERSUS DAVID In SCOTT Re: TEMPLE David Scott 22nd WRIT relator District Under 15: 432. lacked Court, for writs, supervisory Parish The the sane plea to the the and St. of Tammany, law, JJ. legal a not does reflect that guilty plea the nature the of transcript plea See proceed. understand guilty presumption to competent colloquy capacity understood MCCLENDON, Louisiana is Furthermore, relator applying GUIDRY AND defendant a proceedings. that C. J., DENIED. that R. S. La. Judicial WHIPPLE! exists Temple, 559028. No. BEFORE: D S Er 2 2 2016 charges reflects him, against and the consequences of the guilty pleas, and he voluntarily and waived his constitutional and entered the rights knowingly counseled S. Ct. that to are v. pleas. See L. Ed. 2d 321 ( guilty 2680, 125 defense subject failed counsel the State' s waived by relator' s Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584 ( Godinez 1993). to case to La. 1976). JMG COURT OF J., APPEAL, EPUTY FOR CLERK THE concurs. FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT Moreover, guilty 389, U. S. case s claims failed adversarial pleas. 113 and relator' the meaningful unconditioned 509 Moran, investigate VGW McClendon, v. testing See State
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
