Saundra J. Ford VS Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT SAUNDRA J. FORD 2016 NO. CW 1286 VERSUS GARRISON PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE In Re: AND COMPANY Saundra J. DEC 12 2016 Ford, Judicial for applying District Court, supervisory Parish 21st writs, Tangipahoa, of No. 2016 - 109. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, WRIT NOT filed of under 2016, Rules Appeal. The exception contains on the 29, of The party that P. ruling a be 1914 ( art. application Request 4 - 3, within requested, reduced B) . that days ten to Therefore, relator' s of writ is there Notice of to no Intent to file Rules of Louisiana Courts this of of Louisiana If that any Courts relator the the filing application this the on of elects original extension( s) filed writ or Appeal, to writ must writ the by December 27, JMG APPEAL, PUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT new and writ all Civ. the the writ writ and new 2016 Uniform application pertinent an Rules of with including the time application must this documentation filed, court writ and and / or 2 - 18. 7. timely was district Any application. PMc OF a contain VGW D in application 4- 9 application granted before Rules file action. COURT court, Code Appeal. application for rehearing will not be considered. Court, that for Return Date Order were timely filed pursuant to Rule Uniform Supplementation of or open La. proof the transcript 2016 in rendition and / or set application or entry pursuant writing, peremptory and establishing that a judgment was ordered on July 5, a Courts judgment 2016 5, July minute any Louisiana of on timely was defendant' s 2016. of it that Rules on filed application, of preclusion held hearing documentation no ruled JJ. proof Uniform objection September on writ contain 4 - 3, court the the The not and trial at date return does 4- 2 raising judicata res GUIDRY AND McCLENDON, CONSIDERED. 29, September C. J., contain a for must be copy of

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.