State Of Louisiana VS Frederick Cooper

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF 2015 NO. LOUISIANA KW 1449 VERSUS DEC 0 7 2015 FREDERICK COOPER In Frederick Re: applying Cooper, 22nd supervisory writs, Parish Court, District Judicial for St. of No. Tammany, 321551. adjudication illegal 6/ 3/ Cir. 1830 ( Relator' s DENIED. WRIT an HIGGINBOTHAM AND PETTIGREW, BEFORE: is invalid cognizable in 852 ( per a motion 99 - 1213 ( Gedric, v. So. 2d 751 11/ 5/ 99), La. not State habitual the that claim 849, So. 2d 741 99) , is See sentence. JJ. CRAIN, 239. A illegal the and seq., filing must be relief considered in Crim. P. Code 2397 ( La. the of out as provided an has habitual 10/ 15/ 10), for So. 3d 1030 ( JTP TMH WJC COURT OF APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT per State curiam). of P. art. 924 of the delay to not may relief. v. seek claims and proceedings also an nature caption, postconviction See correct the case, ex 32. So. 2d to time this offender 930. 8( A). 45 The in is State See Crim. the 99- nature 703 in is Code than Court. expired application art. by La. rather substance, considered by this postconviction arising remedy relief postconviction et the sentence, seeks correct 1st App. denied, pleading' s determined by its substance and not its caption. 11/ 7/ 97), 97 - 2612 ( La. State, rel. Daley v. his relator styled Although filing as a motion relator to La. writ curiam) , offender See Cotton, be La. 2009-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.