Sandy Gautreaux VS Michael Williams, Werner Enterprises, Inc. of Nebraska and Ace American Insurance. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STA TE L iSIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT SA? DY GAU' I'REAUY 2015 N0. CW 0635 VERSUS MICHAEL WILLIAMS, WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. NEBRASKA AND 110E OF' AMERICAN INSURANCE In P Iichael APRIL 28 , 2015 C0. Re: Wi.l.liams, AcP and v erner 11mc ricat Insurance. 19th writs, super. Tiso.ry Parish of East BEFORE: i4 iagesj item r in and for applying District PART. in prior the is Lim: ne. evidenc of by ceipt Judgmer.t reversed. oF tria)_ at IN lotion " Nebraska Court, JJ. DFNIED s Co. , of 606, 654 . No. DRAKE, AND Inc. Judicial Rouge, plaintif' and Motion aintiff' s each the _ lawsuits AND PART testimony and claims, o IN granting ev= iderice d THERIOT GRANTED WRIT ru ing Baton GUIDRY, Enterprises, Limine plaintiff trial of court court' s (to exclude injuries, payments consider should trial, the during of the denying rendered testimony witr. ess trial accidents, hereby The The betore mal ing a deierminaticr of_ i s admissibility. the Furthermore, trial peremptory exception the to regard anguish and rendered claims child' s with of the writ trial is dccumentation the and financial witness by her den.ying testimony attorney records) . lF2T APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR FIRST CLERK OF THE COUR CIRCUIT UURT seeks in this over the a child' s after Court' s review in Limine the payments case, of petition year Motion during regarding of loss of and this relators' hereby exception amending until evidence JMG OF it as EGD COURT The filed not in.sofar ruling loss, economic is claims child' s with mental consortium, Judgment peremptory admissible as plaintiff s was prescription, of prejudice. relators' overruling reversed. the and with d2nied court' include, to loss of to anguish dismissed adding the criild' s claims the plaintiff' s surgery. The ruling relators' regard mental are s objection of is loss, sustaining consortium, claims raising the economic presc. ription, court' and trial, made to related
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
