State Of Louisiana VS Christopher Finister, Nathaniel Turner, Devontay Ricks, Damarcus Smith, Eric Robertson, John Goza, And Lachoy Slan
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
the reconsider the with be stay the is matter to provide three of 2437, the State " the require 173, 2d So. 879 his be may not defendant. indigent an tools of basic the provide to effective is defendants. the of to prosecution so. did that and case supra. there have file defenses, their Judicial did err cost set Nineteenth the case the Lee, v. indigent trial the the case the establishes no is there prosecution supra followed the to this Therefore, that of writ that Furthermore, until the the their Defender duplicate defense,"adequate that instructed defendants for Moffitt, curiam) . per funding guidelines organizations this 1974). 0129 ( 2004- s State' application for the This documentation a case s defendant' court until defendant legal at defendants funding that no is in until an to counsel of assistance did in million s. u. 417 La. attorney made the forth establishes not in the writ Citizen, in that available becomes a to the adequate an defendant ... , criminal but App. obligation staying application halt to motion the in instant available Cir. 1st the dollars 600, arsenal defendant indigent providing is Therefore, obligation the " with lifted remanded to opportunity only that does 04), 4/ 6/ State to to defendants the 616, present until the dollars million three s White' Judge ct.s. 94 guidelines in an Legislature assure privately this erroneous. is set such district case. order fairly." claims indigent forth time exorbitant provides 2447, as court amount staying retained 176 of the 2d Ed.L. 41 by with Court This defendants defendant Citizen, in the Accordingly, finds v. Ross to orders money prosecution 341 a that to supra and defendants this that with to comply the Citizen, defendants in nothing provide to testified is funding District, District Chief Mitchell, A. Michael and Board, Defender Public Louisiana the for Coordinator Case Capital the Faria, Jean funding, determine to motion the on hearing the at Although 39. 338- 325, 2d So. 898 05), 4/ 1/ La. 1841 ( 2004- Citizen, v. State available. become to likely is funding appropriate the with may court case the forward trial of file, then that that going The defendant determines from court State court the halt the available, not trial JJ. the East of Parish writs, supervisory for thereafter motion When a is District applying No. Judicial Louisiana, of SLAN WRIT BEFORE: Rouge, 19th State Re: In GOZA, JOHN SMITH, DAMARCUS RICKS, DEVONTAY NATHANIEL at adequate KUHN, LACHOY AND ROBERTSON, ERIC 2014-0 3 OEC until option, his funding WELCH, AND PETTIGREW Court, adequate GRANTED. 0382. 14- 04Baton prosecution funding the to until prohibit the available. becomes prosecution may determines TURNER, FINISTER, CHRISTOPHER VERSUS 1440 KW 2014 NO. LOUISIANA OF CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE STATE COURT THE FOR CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT application. writ the consider not would and dissents J., Pettigrew, JEK JEW 1213. 2d So. 642 La. 2839 ( 93- Touchet, v. State in forth 94), 9/ 6/ set guiderines the follow should court district the required, be may hearings parte ex that extent the to determinations, funding these making In case. this in defendants the to provided be to funding of amount 2 1440 KW 2014 PAGE NO. CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
