Estate of Robert E. Riggs VS Way-Jo, L.L.C.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT OF ESTATE 2013 N0. RIGG5 E. ROBERT CW 1940 VERSUS LLC, C/ W WAY- J0, KENT THE V. RIGGS E. ROBERT SARAH M. SUCCESSI01 OF M WAY- J0, AND LLC In LLC, Way- Jo, Re: 19, 728 WRIT to for at to the and Sarah Samuel Estate, as Kent, That Hagan, of is a11 ordered Mary court entered Wayto as into with the and is L. L. C. to the this Court' s assessed be Anthony ' Appeal of Jo, its Costs associated Court were Arthur, Luora to pursuant and, costs abused Tax records Circuit action the trial L. L. C. , court that court against and is costs fees Gail Cheramie, Sherry, as we11 costs incurred in casting Bankston hereby and to as Ted Dr. one- half these of the Wayne and reversed, of Robert Riggs owed Ann judgment John the Estate witness expert a11 and costs Moticn") . ( the court Motion s to Jo, Way- with as trial follows : portion defendants, L . L. C. ' First this and the transcripts judgment, 2012 28, December in that well Court" party prevailing as Louisiana Supreme Louisiana find deposition trial the No. Helena, JJ. THERIOT, AND Way- Jo, denying in costs evidence appeais We GRANTED. discretion of 21st writs, St . 20, 714 . HIGGINBOTHAM KUHN, BEFORE: c/ w a)/, Y supervisory Parish Court, District Judicial for applying 7 is it to pay Hudspeth the and remaining consolidated matters. The remaining one- half of the court costs ar2 to be one- paid tnird by Anthony Samuel by and Arthur, and Cheramie, Gai1 one- third Luora and one- third by Saran trial court Kent. In all is the judgment of the affirmed. It respects, other is further costs of the by Estate of Robert Riggs and the remaining one- half of tne costs are to be paid one- third by Samuel and Luora these ordered that one- half appeals consolidated by Anthony one- third by Sarah Kent . Arthur, and appeal to Supreme addition, costs of La. Court are R. S . taking ... shall be and costs of 13 : 4533 L. L. C. ' in opposing states, depositions taxed as and court and costs . " in and Court unambiguously the s costs in of relevant of Way- of costs incurred writs costs copies Thus, Cheramie, this costs Jo, the paid and 1920, art. court Way- appeals . this Court P. Civ. taxed indisputably consolidated trial Code La . to Pursuant of be Gail and tnird one- to are the the the Louisiana appeal . In that the part, acts Jo, in the used L. L. C. is on the STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 1940 Page entitled court' is for to recover one- costs the and third by costs, filing and is entered in $ 1, $ third for for costs Jo, L. L. C. ' s Jo, is s favor of costs, associated appeal L. L. C. trial L. L. C. ` deposition 461 . 38 Way- with briefs and entitled to to be paid one- third by Samuel by Anthony is further It Kent. 027 . 18 which the judgment 1, $ 673. 13, one- exhibits that Way- of and Accordingly, denied Way- Jo, of Thus, totaling Sarah depositions trial. judgment amount writ. Arthur, Luora the at reversed and in preparation for 2013 exhibit oppositions costs evidence 7, hereby L. L. C. JO, 184 . 57 and into October s Motion the recover entered were Way- to 2 and Gail ordered Cheramie, that the and costs filing of the instant writ application are to be paid one- third by Samuel and Luora Arthur, in incurred one- third by Anthony the with connection Gail and Cheramie, and one- third by Sarah Kent . JEK TMFi MRT i COURT L. " OF APPEAL, FIRST t' ยข PUTY FOR CLERK THE OF CIRCUIT z' COURT COURT
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
