Houston Dock, Jr. VS Brunt Construction, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DOCK, HOUSTON 2013 N0. JR. CW 1395 VERSUS BRUNT CONSTRUCTION, INSURANCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL XYZ FOUNDATION, INSURANCE TAMMANY COMPANY, ST. HOSPITAL SERVICE D/ B/ A ABC SLIDELL COMPANY, SLIDELL PARISH #2 DISTRICT MEMORIAL In 21st writs, WRIT filed NOT Rules Court appears Parish of Courts JJ. that 8, August on Louisiana of McCLENDON, AND It CONSIDERLD. this with supervisory Court, 2012- 2746. MeDONALD, PETTIGREW, for applying District Judicial No. Tangipahoa, BEFORE: Inc. , Construction, Brunt Re: Uniform 2013 NOV 2 HOSPITAL the 2013 is application untimely Rule Appeal, of writ 4- 2 under and 4- 3 . The interlocutory ruling at issue was rendered in open court on and the transcript does not reflect that the court 2013, July 1, ordered party the judgment to requested that ten days of The writ application, or request the for a reduced judgment in rendition Courts Louisiana be the which return date writing reduced not as include required 4- 2, Rules or to that either writing within C . C. P . La . court . open does Appeal, of to be a by 4- 3, art . notice of Uniform 4- and 1919B. intent Rules 5 ( 11) , o£ was filed more than 30 days after the rulinq in open court . Supplementation application 2- In the Court, this for Rules event it must seeks be to filed fzle of a documentation on before of 4- 9 an and Appeal . new application showing the Appeal . December 12, with original comply with Rules Courts or Rules considered. Courts filed and must Louisiana of be not and/ or application writ Louisiana produce timely Rules application of relator must application was Uniform will rehearing Uniform 18 . 7, this of 2- 12 . 2, Any 2013, new and must contain a copy of this ruling. JNII+ I PMc PETTIGREW, J. , dissents and would deny the writ on the merits . COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT i. DEPUTY FOR CLERK THE OF COURT COURT waive the rule violations and
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
