KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION V. BRADLEY F . WALLACE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TO BE PUBLISHED
,Sixpumt fl~oixrf of
2002-SC-0399-KB
2002-SC-0464-KB
2002-SC-0895-KB
FDDA
cT
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION
V.
MOVANT
IN SUPREME COURT
BRADLEY F. WALLACE
RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER
Bradley Wallace, whose last known address was Louisa, Kentucky, was
admitted to the practice of law in Kentucky in 1996 . In December 2001, Wallace
was suspended for noncompliance with CLE requirements . He has not
completed any CLE hours since that time and accordingly has not been
reinstated to practice law. The Kentucky Bar Association has filed with this Court
four disciplinary matters in which the Board of Governors has recommended
various periods of suspension .
KBA File No . 7890
In 1996, Wallace was substituted as counsel for James Maynard in an
action to quiet title filed in the Martin Circuit Court, following the death of
Maynard's previous counsel . In February 1999, after an adverse judgment was
entered against Maynard, Wallace filed a notice of appeal in the Court of
Appeals . However, on March 26, 1999, the court issued an order requiring
Maynard to show cause why his appeal should not dismissed for failure to file a
prehearing statement. Wallace neither informed Maynard of the show cause
order nor filed the prehearing statement, causing the appeal to be dismissed.
In March 2001, the Inquiry Commission charged Wallace with failing to
provide adequate representation, failing to act with reasonable diligence, and
failing to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of his case, in
violation of SCR 3.130-1 .1, 3 .130-1 .3, and 3 .130-1 .4(a) . Although Wallace
initially responded to Maynard's Bar complaint, he did not file an answer to the
Commission's charge and the matter proceeded as a default case.
KBA File No . 8414
In July 1996, Fanny Anderson was arrested in Louisa, Kentucky, for DUI .
After officers handcuffed her and left her unattended in the cruiser, she escaped .
Several months later, Anderson's body was found under the Big Sandy Bridge
with only one hand still cuffed . Anderson's mother, Bessie Napier, retained
attorney Teresa Hall of Williamson, West Virginia, to file a 42 USC 1983 action in
the U .S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky to recover damages for
Anderson's wrongful death and violation of her constitutional rights .
Although Hall filed a complaint in July 1997, she moved to withdraw as
Napier's attorney approximately one year later. Wallace entered an appearance
as Napier's new counsel in August 1998 . It appears as though Wallace did
substantial work on the case for the next year, and eventually filed a complaint in
the Lawrence Circuit Court following the federal court's entry of summary
judgment in favor of the defendants . However, by mid-August 1999, Wallace had
abandoned the case and, after he failed to appear for a hearing in the circuit
court, summary judgment was entered against Napier .
In October 2001, the Inquiry Commission charged Wallace with failing to
act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing his client, failing to
keep his client reasonably informed about the status of a case and failing to
comply with the client's request for information, and failing to protect his client's
interests and to return her file when requested to do so, in violation of SCR
3.130-1 .3, 3.130-1 .4(a), and 3 .130-1 .16(d). Wallace was served with the charge
by the Secretary of State . The charge was returned undelivered and the matter
proceeded as a default case.
The Board of Governors considered Cases 7890 and 8414 together and
entered its report on May 9, 2002 . The Board concluded that Wallace clearly
failed to preserve Maynard's right to appeal . Further, with regard to the Napier
case, the Board concluded that not only did Wallace fail to timely file the state
court action, but thereafter failed to respond to the motion for summary judgment
or to advise Napier of his withdrawal from the matter . Thus, the Board
unanimously found Wallace guilty of all charges . The Board recommended that
Wallace be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 181 days .
KBA File No. 7705
In February 1999, Wallace accepted a $500 fee from Shelly and Robert
Harris to file suit against a contractor, which suit was never filed . The Harrises
paid Wallace an additional $250 on a separate case against a different
contractor, and while Wallace did obtain a default judgment against this second
contractor, he never informed the Harrises of such. The Harrises alleged that at
the beginning of October 1999, after they had been unable to contact Wallace for
several months, they went to his office only to find it vacant. A cleaning person
informed the Harrises that Wallace's mother was in possession of all of his files .
The Harrises subsequently obtained their file from Wallace's mother.
In February 2000, the Inquiry Commission charged Wallace with failing to
act with reasonable diligence and promptness, failing to keep his clients
reasonably informed about the status of their case and to comply with requests
for information, and for abandoning his law practice without advance notice and
arrangements to return client files, in violation of SCR 3.130-1 .3, 3.130-1 .4(a),
and 3 .130-1 .3 & 1 .4 .
Wallace filed a pro se answer denying the charges and the matter
proceeded to an evidentiary hearing before a trial commissioner, who found
Wallace guilty of all charges . Based, in part, upon the fact that Wallace had
never reimbursed the Harrises their $500, the trial commissioner recommended
that he be suspended for a period of 90 days.
In May 2002, in Wallace's absence despite having been given notice, the
Board of Governors exercised its discretion to review the evidence de novo , and
also unanimously concluded that he was guilty of all charges . In a report entered
June 5, 2002, the Board recommended that Wallace be suspended for ninety
days, to run "consecutive to any other disciplinary cases previously decided with
a condition of reinstatement being that the Respondent show proof of payment of
the restitution to Mr. & Mrs . Robert M . Harris in the amount of $500 before
applying for reinstatement."
KBA File No . 7618
Circuit Judge Stephen N . Frazier initiated a complaint against Wallace in a
letter to the Office of Bar Counsel for the KBA dated August 27, 1999. Judge
Frazier noted Wallace's "consistent and constant failure to appear in court on
behalf of his clients." Specifically, Wallace failed to appear in the Johnson Circuit
Court on behalf of a Jasper Davis in the case of Commonwealth v. Davis, 98-CR0063, thus requiring Judge Frazier to appoint a public defender .
The KBA contacted Mr . Davis concerning the matter and subsequently
received a letter from an Erma Davis, wherein she stated that she and Mr. Davis
had paid Wallace $800 on one occasion and had also given him a 1988 Ford
Ranger truck that Ms . Davis stated was valued at approximately $1,400. Wallace
thereafter failed to appear on Mr. Davis' behalf on two occasions . Ms . Davis
stated that Wallace did not return either the money or the truck.
On March 21, 2001, the Inquiry Commission charged Wallace with failing
to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing his client, failing
to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and complying
with requests for information, failing to protect his client's interest, and failing to
maintain a current address with the KBA, in violation of SCR 3 .130-1 .3, 3.1301 .4(a), 3 .130-1 .16(d), and 3 .175
Wallace did not respond to any inquiries about the matter and the KBA
was unable to locate him . Service of the charges was attempted through the
Secretary of State but returned undeliverable on November 9, 2001 . On October
25, 2002, the Board of Governors subsequently found Wallace guilty of all
charges and recommended a suspension of two years to run consecutive to any
other suspensions .
This Court ordered Wallace's disciplinary cases consolidated for review .
Although not recommended by the Board of Governors, the KBA now argues that
Wallace's conduct warrants permanent disbarment . However, all of the cases
relied upon by the KBA involve charges of intentional fraud or deceit. Kentucky
Bar Association v . Zimmerman , Ky., 69 S .W.3d 465 (2001) ; Kentucky Bar
Association v. Loser, Ky ., 24 S .W.3d 660 (2000) ; Kentucky Bar Association v .
Taylor , Ky., 997 S .W .2d 464 (1999) ; Broadway v . Kentucky Bar Association , Ky.,
997 S .W.2d 467 (1999) .
While Wallace's conduct is certainly egregious and reprehensible, the
Inquiry Commission did not see fit to charge him in any of the matters with
dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation . Indeed, Wallace's actions
portray incompetence and negligence rather than intentional dishonesty.
The record reveals that Wallace has been incarcerated on at least two
occasions in the recent past on alcohol-related charges, and that his
whereabouts are unknown . There is also evidence that he is currently homeless
and suffering from mental illness . Given his recent history, there is little doubt
that, even in the absence of any imposition of suspension, Wallace will not be fit
to return to the practice of law for an extended period of time . Nonetheless, we
conclude that permanent disbarment is not warranted at this time.
Accordingly, we adopt the recommendations of the Board of Governors
and hereby order that 1 . Respondent, Bradley F . Wallace, is hereby suspended from the
practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky for a period of one hundred
;
and eighty-one days in connection with KBA Files 7890 and 8414, ninety days in
connection with KBA File 7705, and two years in connection with KBA File 7615,
all to run consecutively. Said suspensions are, of course, independent of and in
addition to Wallace's indefinite suspension for failing to comply with CLE
requirements . The period of suspension shall continue until such time as
Wallace is reinstated to the practice of law pursuant to SCR 3 .510, or any
controlling amendment to SCR 3 .510 .
2 . Pursuant to SCR 3 .390, Wallace shall provide notice to any clients, if
applicable, he currently represents of his inability to provide further
representation, notify all courts in which he currently has matters pending of his
suspension, and provide the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association with copies
of said letters .
3. Pursuant to SCR 3 .450, Wallace is required to pay all costs associated
with these disciplinary proceedings, said sum being $1209.17, for which
execution may issue from this Court upon finality of this Opinion and Order.
All concur.
ENTERED : August 21, 2003 .
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
