RONALD WAYNE ALVEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: MAY 4, 2001; 2:00 p.m.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
C ommonwealth O f K entucky
C ourt O f A ppeals
NO.
NO.
2000-CA-000430-MR
AND
2000-CA-001420-MR
RONALD WAYNE ALVEY
APPELLANT
APPEALS FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE JUDITH MCDONALD-BURKMAN, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 83-CR-000101
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
APPELLEE
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE:
BUCKINGHAM, EMBERTON, AND TACKETT, JUDGES.
TACKETT, JUDGE:
Ronald Wayne Alvey appeals from two orders of
the Jefferson Circuit Court denying him post-conviction relief on
his motions filed pursuant to Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure
(CR) 60.02.
We affirm.
Alvey was indicted for two counts of first degree
robbery and as a first degree persistent felony offender.
In
1984, he pled guilty to the robbery charges and to an amended
charge of second degree persistent felony offender.
The Commonwealth correctly points out that the present
appeals represent successive attacks on his 1984 conviction.
Alvey has previously filed two motions for relief under Kentucky
Rule of Criminal Procedure (RCr) 11.42 which were both denied.
He filed a subsequent motion for CR 60.02 relief alleging that
his 1976 convictions were void because the judgments were not
signed.
The trial court denied his motion and we affirmed in an
unpublished opinion, 1999-CA-000114, which is currently pending
on a motion for discretionary review before the Kentucky Supreme
Court.
In a subsequent CR 60.02 motion, Alvey argued that
Kentucky Revised Statute 532.080, which pertains to persistent
felony offender sentencing, requires a jury verdict of
conviction, and that the statute should be void for vagueness.
The trial court’s order denying relief on the grounds stated in
this motion is one of the subjects of this appeal and was
assigned the case number 2000-CA-000430.
In his latest motion for relief under CR 60.02, Alvey
alleges that his robbery convictions were improperly enhanced.
Alvey argues that because the judgments of conviction on the
underlying offenses, which were entered in 1976, were not signed
by a judge, they could not form the basis for the charge of
persistent felony offender.
The trial court also denied this
motion without a hearing, and Alvey filed another appeal which we
have designated as case number 2000-CA-001420.
These appeals sub
judice, represent Alvey’s third and fourth post-conviction
challenges to his persistent felony offender conviction.
Successive motions raising claims that either have or should have
-2-
been presented earlier cannot be reviewed on appeal.
Hampton v.
Commonwealth, Ky., 454 S.W.2d 672 (1970).
For the foregoing reasons, the judgments of the
Jefferson Circuit Court denying Alvey’s two motions for postconviction relief pursuant to CR 60.02 are affirmed.
ALL CONCUR.
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:
Ronald Wayne Alvey, Pro Se
West Liberty, Kentucky
Albert B. Chandler, III
Attorney General
Vickie L. Wise
Assistant Attorney General
Frankfort, Kentucky
-3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.