CLAUDETTE McGOWAN, Administratrix of the Estate of Winston D. McGowan v. FRUIT OF THE LOOM, INC.; HON. IRENE B. STEEN, Administrative Law Judge; and WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
RENDERED: December 13, 1996; 2:00 p.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO. 96-CA-0534-WC CLAUDETTE McGOWAN, Administratrix of the Estate of Winston D. McGowan APPELLANT PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD ACTION NO. WC-93-29993 FRUIT OF THE LOOM, INC.; HON. IRENE B. STEEN, Administrative Law Judge; and WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD APPELLEES OPINION AFFIRMING *** BEFORE: *** *** *** EMBERTON, MILLER, and SCHRODER, Judges. MILLER, JUDGE. Claudette McGowan, administratrix of the estate of Winston D. McGowan, asks us to review an opinion of the Workers' Compensation Board (board) rendered 26 January 1996. Ky. Rev. Stat. (KRS) 342.290. We affirm. Appellant argues that the board erred in failing to find upon the evidence that McGowan had sustained an injury of appreciable proportions while in the employ of Fruit of the Loom, Inc., thus resulting in an occupational disability as defined in the Workers' Compensation Act. KRS Chapter 342. We have examined the evidence and are of the opinion that the board was correct in rejecting McGowan's claim under the authority of Special Fund v. Francis, Ky., 708 S.W.2d 641 (1986), and Paramount Foods, Inc. v. Burkhardt, Ky., 695 S.W.2d 418 (1985). Under the mandate of Western Baptist Hosp. v. Kelly, Ky., 827 S.W.2d 685 (1992), we decline to reverse the decision of the board. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Workers' Compensation Board is affirmed. ALL CONCUR. -2- BRIEF AND ORAL ARGUMENT FOR APPELLANT/McGOWAN: BRIEF AND ORAL ARGUMENT FOR APPELLEE/FRUIT OF THE LOOM: Joel R. Smith Wilson & Smith Law Office Jamestown, KY Jefferson V. Layson III Harned, Bachert & Denton Bowling Green, KY -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.