State v. Dooley
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the court of appeals affirming the judgment of the district court revoking Defendant's probation and ordering him to serve his underlying sentence, holding that the district court did not err in revoking Defendant's probation.
Defendant entered into a plea agreement for failing to register as an offender. The district court sentenced him to 120 months' incarceration but granted him probation for a thirty-six-month period. In 2013, the State filed a second motion to revoke Defendant's probation, alleging several violations. The district court revoked Defendant's probation and ordered him to serve his original prison sentence. The Supreme Court reversed in part and remanded the case. On remand, the court revoked Defendant's probation and ordered him to serve his underlying sentence. The court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that there was no error by the district court or the court of appeals.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.