Indiana Tax Court Decisions 1991

DEPT. OF STATE REV. v. Estate of Puschel
Date: December 16, 1991
Citation: 582 N.E.2d 923
Docket Number: 64T10-9105-TA-00021
Harlan Sprague v. Dept. of State Revenue
Date: December 6, 1991
Citation: 583 N.E.2d 214
Docket Number: 49T05-9007-TA-00038
Leehaug v. STATE BD. OF TAX COM'RS
Date: November 18, 1991
Citation: 583 N.E.2d 211
Docket Numbers: 49T10-9108-SC-00044, 49T10-9109-SC-00046
General Motors v. Dept. of State Revenue
Date: September 11, 1991
Citation: 578 N.E.2d 399
Docket Number: 49T05-8912-TA-00064
COWDEN & SONS v. Dept. of State Revenue
Date: August 1, 1991
Citation: 575 N.E.2d 718
Docket Number: 49T05-9001-TA-00004
Kentron, Inc. v. STATE BD. OF TAX COM'RS
Date: June 11, 1991
Citation: 572 N.E.2d 1366
Docket Number: 71T05-8911-TA-00052
Evansville Concrete v. Dept. of St. Rev.
Date: May 23, 1991
Citation: 571 N.E.2d 1350
Docket Number: 82T05-9003-TA-00015
C & C OIL v. Dept. of State Revenue
Date: April 15, 1991
Citation: 570 N.E.2d 1376
Docket Number: 49T05-9006-TA-00027
Caylor-Nickel v. Dept. of State Revenue
Date: April 4, 1991
Citation: 569 N.E.2d 765
Docket Number: 49T05-9002-TA-00009
Glass Wholesalers v. TAX COM'RS
Date: March 28, 1991
Citation: 568 N.E.2d 1116
Docket Number: 45T05-8911-TA-00056
JOHNSON CTY. FARM BUR. v. Dept. of Revenue
Date: March 21, 1991
Citation: 568 N.E.2d 578
Docket Number: 49T05-8912-TA-00066
Rogers v. STATE BD. OF TAX COM'RS
Date: January 24, 1991
Citation: 565 N.E.2d 398
Docket Number: 02T05-8910-TA-00044
Lakeview Country Club v. TAX COM'RS
Date: January 22, 1991
Citation: 565 N.E.2d 392
Docket Number: 18T05-8910-TA-00042
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.