William Eugene Murray v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. FILED Nov 15 2019, 9:04 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Ana M. Quirk Muncie, Indiana Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Marjorie Lawyer-Smith Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA William Eugene Murray, November 15, 2019 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-CR-1364 v. State of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff Appeal from the Delaware Circuit Court The Honorable Thomas A. Cannon, Jr., Judge Trial Court Cause No. 18C05-1610-F5-174 Baker, Judge. Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-1364 | November 15, 2019 Page 1 of 2 [1] This opinion is being handed down in tandem with a companion opinion in Case Number 19A-CR-1350, and the issues raised by William Murray in both appeals are identical. Pursuant to our analysis in that case, we affirm. Kirsch, J., and Crone, J., concur. Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-1364 | November 15, 2019 Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.