Vill v. Industrial Comm'n

Annotate this Case
Docket No. 99121, Vill v. Industrial Comm'n

Docket No. 99121-Agenda 17-May 2005.

MARGARET VILL, Appellant, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al. (Loyola University Medical Center, Appellee).

Filed December 1, 2005.

PER CURIAM: In this case, one Justice of this Court has recused himself and the remaining members of the Court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, ยง3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See People v. Griffith, 212 Ill. 2d 57, 58 (2004), citing Perlman v. First National Bank, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).

Thomas, C.J., took no part.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.