Smith v. Kuriyama

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-22-0000399 15-JUL-2022 09:32 AM Dkt. 6 ODDP SCPW-22-0000399 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I DEXTER SMITH, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE CHRISTINE E. KURIYAMA, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1PR161000009) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioner Dexter Smith’s (Smith’s) petition for writ of mandamus, filed on June 20, 2022, the documents attached and submitted in support, and the record, HRPP Rule 40(i) does not require Judge Kuriyama to refer Smith to the public defender’s office for representation because Smith’s Rule 40 petition was found to be patently frivolous and without a trace of support either in the record or from anything submitted by Smith, and this finding was affirmed on appeal. Nor was it a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion for Judge Kuriyama to issue the May 25, 2022 order while Smith’s petition for writ of mandamus was pending before this court because Smith’s petition requested that his HRPP Rule 47 motion be transferred to another circuit court judge when Judge Kuriyama, among other reasons, had not yet filed an order addressing his HRPP Rule 47 motion. extraordinary writ is thus not warranted. An See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (explaining that a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; such a writ is meant to restrain a judge who has exceeded the judge’s jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in which the judge has a legal duty to act). Accordingly, It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 15, 2022. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.