Wagner v. Hiraoka

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-18-0000670 17-OCT-2018 02:02 PM SCPW-18-0000670 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ EDWARD WAGNER, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE KEITH K. HIRAOKA, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge, and STEPHEN KEAWE ROY; REBECCA ROY; GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.; GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.; TIMOTHY DAYTON; RICHARD DWYER; and JOHN DORNAN, Respondents. _________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 13-1-2053-07) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioner Edward Wagner’s petition for writ of prohibition and writ of mandamus, filed on August 27, 2018, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that the respondent judge complied with the procedure set forth in Grube v. Trader, 142 Hawai#i 412, 420 P.3d 343 (2018) in addressing the sealing issue, an appeal is pending in the Intermediate Court of Appeals (CAAP-18-0000613), and petitioner fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to the requested extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Gannett Pac. Corp. v. Richardson, 59 Haw. 224, 226, 580 P.2d 49, 53 (1978) (a petition for writ of prohibition is not meant to serve as a legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedures). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of prohibition and writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 17, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.