Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wooten
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000405 17-JUN-2013 11:19 AM NO. SCAD-12-0000405 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. ANDRà S. WOOTEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 08-054-8697) ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Upon consideration of the June 3, 2013 affidavit submitted by Respondent André S. Wooten and the record, it appears Respondent Wooten has complied with all relevant requirements of his ninety-day period of suspension from the practice of law and with the requirements of Rule 2.16 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH). It further appears the Office of Disciplinary Counsel was personally served notice of the affidavit, as required by RSCH Rule 2.17(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.17(b), Respondent Wooten is reinstated to the practice of law in the jurisdiction of the State of Hawai#i, effective upon entry of this order. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 17, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
