Tautua v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30291 13-NOV-2012 02:43 PM NO. SCWC-30291 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ROPATI J. TAUTUA, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant, vs. BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent/Employer-Appellee, Self-Insured, and SEDGWICK CMS, Respondent/Third-Party Administrator-Appellee. CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30291; CASE NO. AB 2005-503 (2-99-06569)) ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakasone, in place of Acoba, J., recused) On November 2, 2012, petitioner/claimant-appellant Ropati J. Tautua filed a document asking the court to provide the reasons his application of a writ of certiorari was rejected. Upon review of the document and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that to the extent petitioner s request is a motion for reconsideration of the October 30, 2012 order rejecting his application for a writ certiorari, it is dismissed. See HRAP 40.1(h) ( Neither acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme court. ). Moreover, there is no basis for clarification of the October 30, 2012 order. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 13, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.