Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Partington
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCAD-11-0000162
14-MAR-2012
02:38 PM
SCAD-11-0000162
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
EARLE A. PARTINGTON, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(ODC 10-079-8913)
ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy and McKenna, JJ.,
and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura,
in place of Acoba, J., recused)
Upon consideration of Respondent Earle A. Partington’s
February 15, 2012 Motion to Amend the November 9, 2011 Order of
Suspension, the memorandum in support of the motion, the
February 29, 2012 order of the Supreme Court of the State of
Hawai'i reinstating Respondent Partington to the practice of law
in this jurisdiction, and the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied as moot.
DATED:
Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 14, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Craig H. Nakamura
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
