Suntera, The Solar Electric Chariot Company v. Quinn

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 26654 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I SUNTERA, THE SOLAR ELECTRIC CHARIOT COMPANY, A HAWAII CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. THOMAS QUINN; HAWAII ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT; BARBARA KIM-STANTON; HERBERT HENDRICKSON; DAVID YUN; HIGH TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A HAWAII CORPORATION; KENNETH KATO; RICHARD MOODY; MAURICE KAYA; STATE OF HAWAII OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL; ARGYLE TELEVISION COMPANY; CATHERINE CRUZ, Defendants-Appellees and JOHN DOES AND JANE ROES, INDIVIDUALS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 5 AND STATE AGENCIES 1 THROUGH 5, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 96-3580) (By: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, and Duffy, JJ. and Acoba, J., dissenting) Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of the November 4, 2004 order dismissing appeal, the papers in support and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 22, 2004. Richard C. DeWaele for plaintiff-appellant on the motion

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.