Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Foley
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 20641 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. THOMAS M. FOLEY, Respondent. ODC 95-132-4591 ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT (By: Levinson, Acting C.J., Nakayama and Acoba, JJ., and Circuit Judge Alm, in place of former Circuit Judge Kevin Chang, previously assigned in place of Moon, C.J., recused, and Circuit Judge Graulty, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of the record and the Amended Disciplinary Board s Report and Recommendation for the Reinstatement of Thomas M. Foley to the Practice of Law in this jurisdiction, it appears that Petitioner Foley has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, his rehabilitation, fitness to practice law, competence, compliance with all applicable disciplinary orders and rules, and compliance with other requirements imposed by the court, as required by Rule 2.17(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i, and should be reinstated to the practice of law. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Thomas M. Foley s Petition for Reinstatement is granted and Petitioner Foley is reinstated to the practice of law in this jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon payment of all required dues and registration fees, the Clerk shall restore Petitioner Thomas M. Foley to the roll of attorneys eligible to practice in the State of Hawai#i. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 9, 2003. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
