Suntera, The Solar Electric Chariot Company v. Quinn
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 25311 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ SUNTERA, THE SOLAR ELECTRIC CHARIOT COMPANY, a Hawaii corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. THOMAS QUINN; et al., HAWAII ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT; BARBARA KIM-STANTON; HERBERT HENDRICKSON; DAVID YUN; HIGH TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Hawaii corporation; KENNETH KATO; RICHARD MOODY; MAUARICE KAYA; STATE OF HAWAII OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL; ARGYLE TELEVISION COMPANY; CATHERINE CRUZ; JOHN DOES AND JANE ROES, INDIVIDUALS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 5 AND STATE AGENCIES 1 THROUGH 5, Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------McCORRISTON MILLER MUKAI MacKINNON, LLP, Movant-Appellee, and ANTHONY P. LOCRICCHIO, General Counsel, CEO and President of Suntera and as Agent for the Estate of Jonathan Tennyson and its Trustees Joanne T. McKay and Jane T. Sward, Appellee. _________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 96-3580-08) (By: ORDER Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon consideration of Appellant Suntera s motion to withdraw its appeal pursuant to HRAP Rule 42(b), the papers in support, and the records and files herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant Suntera s motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed pursuant to HRAP Rule 42(b). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 11, 2002. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
