Ek v. Boggs
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 24029 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I WILLIAM EK, aka Eugene William Ek, aka Eugene Ek, aka Bill Ek, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee vs. STEVEN EUGENE BOGGS, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant and SANDY BOGGS, aka Sandy Burgard, aka Sandy Byrnes, aka Sandy Diane Boggs, aka Sandy Ek, aka Frances Byrnes, aka Julie Kahn, aka Juliette Kahn, and Doe Defendants 1-100, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 98-2468) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) the October 16, 2000 judgment, which purports to be the final judgment on the counterclaims and cross-claims filed in Civil No. 98-2468, does not identify the claims for which the judgment is entered; see Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai#i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338-39 (1994) (In a multiple claim or multiple party circuit court case, a judgment that purports to be the final judgment must identify the claims for 1 which the judgment is entered.); and thus, (2) this appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 1, 2001. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
