Young v. Blaich
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 22881 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ DEBORAH D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. GARY BLAICH, M.D.; RON BLUESTEIN, M.D.; JANE DONAHUE; WILLIAM KEEGAN; BARBARA PARRIOT; JUDITH SAMFORD, PH.D.; KELLY SWITZER; PATRICIA THIELEN; DYKES YOUNG, M.D.; RAY TAUSCHEK; HAWAI#I STATE HOSPITAL; STATE OF HAWAI#I; and ADJUSTING SERVICES OF HAWAI#I, INC., Defendants-Appellees and MICHAEL SERFASS, JOHN DOES 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 1-10, Defendants _________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 96-1220) (By: SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Plaintiff-appellant Deborah D. Young (Appellant) appeals the first circuit court s dismissal of claims against defendant-appellee Adjusting Services of Hawai#i, Inc. and the court s orders of summary judgment in favor of defendantsappellees Gary Blaich, M.D.; Ron Bluestein, M.D.; Jane Donahue; William Keegan, Barbara Parriot, Judith Samford, Ph.D.; Kelly Switzer; Patricia Thielen; Dykes Young, M.D.; Ray Tauschek; Hawai#i State Hospital; and the State of Hawai#i. On appeal, Appellant argues that the circuit court s orders of dismissal and summary judgment were improper. As an initial matter, we note that Appellant s opening brief fails to comply with the requirements of Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 28. Although such noncompliance offers sufficient grounds for the dismissal of the appeal, this court may address the issues raised by Appellant because this court has consistently adhered to the policy of affording litigants the opportunity to have their cases heard on the merits, where possible. Housing Finance and Development Corp. v. Ferguson, 91 Hawai#i 81, 86, 979 P.2d 1107, 1112 (1999) (quotation omitted). Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we hold that because: (1) with respect to the motion to dismiss, Appellant s complaint failed to establish that Adjusting Services of Hawaii, Inc. owed an implied duty of good faith to Appellant, and (2) with respect to the motions for summary judgment, Appellant failed not only to file any opposition to the motions, but also to appear at the hearings on the motions, the circuit court s orders and judgment were proper. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the orders and judgment of the circuit court from which the appeal is taken are affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 1, 2001. On the briefs: Deborah Young, Plaintiff-Appellant pro se Kathleen N. A. Watanabe, Gary K. H. Kam, and Sarah R. Hirakami, Deputy Attorneys General, for DefendantsAppellees State of Hawai#i, Department of Health; Gary Blaich; Ron Bluestein; Jane Donahue; William Keegan; Barbara Parriot; Judith Samford; Kelly Switzer; Patricia Thielen; Dykes Young; and Ray Tauschek Keith Hiraoka and April Luria for DefendantAppellee Adjusting Services of Hawai#i, Inc. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
