Lum v. Donohue
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23605 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I BERNARD K. B. LUM and HESTER T. LUM, Movant-Appellees vs. LEE D. DONOHUE, Chief of Police, City and County of Honolulu, Respondent-Appellant and DAI-TOKYO ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Intervenor-Appellee APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (S.P. NO. 00-1-0167) (By: ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the statements supporting and contesting jurisdiction and the record, it appears that: (1) the May 9, 2000 order disposing of Special Proceeding 00-1-0167 has not been reduced to a separate judgment, as required by Rule 58 of the Hawai#i Rules of Civil Procedure; and, thus, (2) this appeal is premature and we lack jurisdiction. See Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai#i 115, 869 P.2d 1334 (1994). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 3, 2000.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
