Cockett v. State

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23252 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ ERIC K. COCKETT, Petitioner-Appellant vs. STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent-Appellee _________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT (S.P.P. NO. 99-0006(3)) (By: ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that the supreme court clerk s office informed Appellant Eric K. Cockett by letter dated June 9, 2000 that the statement of jurisdiction was in default and by letter dated June 30, 2000 that the opening brief was in default and that pursuant to Rule 30 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure the matter would be called to the attention of the court for such action as the court deemed proper, including dismissal of the appeal. The letter of June 30, 2000 has been returned as undeliverable, and it appears that Appellant has abandoned his appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 25, 2000.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.