State v. Cunningham

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 23203 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. DAN CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant _________________________________________________________________ APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CASE NO. CTR-1 OF 10/6/94) (By: ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, (1) the supreme court clerk s office informed Appellant Dan Cunningham by letter dated May 26, 2000 that the record on appeal cannot be filed without payment of the filing fee pursuant to Rule 3(f) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) or an executed motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to HRAP 24 and that the matter would be called to the attention of the court for such action as the court deemed proper pursuant to Rule 11(a), including dismissal of the appeal; and (2) appellant failed to pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 25, 2000.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.