Anthony v. Georgia
Annotate this CaseAppellant Danny Anthony was tried by jury and convicted of murder. He appealed, contending: (1) that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain his convictions and that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for pretrial immunity; (2) the trial court erred when it failed to excuse a prospective juror for cause, when it admitted evidence of other acts of the appellant; and (3) the trial court erred when it charged the jury. After its review of the trial court record and the parties' briefs submitted on appeal, the Supreme Court found no reversible error, and affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.