Statacos v. Georgia
Annotate this CaseAppellant Steven George Stratacos challenged four of his convictions for felony theft by deception based on his deceitful promises to perform various construction services. He claimed that the evidence presented at trial showed he provided some services but did not establish their value, and thus the evidence did not support the jury's guilty verdicts. Upon review, the Supreme Court concluded the evidence presented was sufficient to support appellant's felony convictions, but insufficient to support even a misdemeanor conviction as to one. Accordingly, the Supreme Court affirmed in part, and reversed in part.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.