Lewis v. Georgia
Annotate this CaseDefendant Willie Henry Lewis appealed his convictions for the malice murders of Xavier Dinkins and Kejaun Webb, as well as a variety of other crimes that occurred over a four-day crime spree. On appeal, Defendant argued that a family tie between a prospective juror and the prosecuting attorney was grounds to strike that juror from voir dire for cause. Further, Defendant argued that the admission of certain facts into evidence were improper, and grounds for reversal of his conviction. He also contended that much of the evidence entered against him was insufficient to support his conviction. Upon review, the Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decisions with respect to voir dire and the admission of evidence, however, the Court could not determine from the record whether Defendant's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective had merit. Accordingly, the Court affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the case for a hearing on the ineffective assistance of counsel issue.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.