Jones v. State

Annotate this Case

666 S.E.2d 614 (2008)

JONES v. The STATE.

No. A08A1055.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

August 6, 2008.

*615 Rowe, Rowe & Thomas, Anton L. Rowe, Stone Mountain, for appellant.

Robert D. James Jr., Solicitor-General, Matthew Ciccarelli, Asst. Solicitor-General, for appellee.

PHIPPS, Judge.

Michael Jones was convicted of several criminal offenses. He did not move for a new trial. On appeal, his only claim is ineffective assistance of trial counsel and that claim is procedurally barred.

An ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim must be raised at the earliest practicable moment.[1] This rule requires that an ineffective assistance claim be raised before appeal if the opportunity to do so is available.[2] A motion for new trial presents such an opportunity, and the failure to seize that opportunity is a procedural bar to raising the issue on appeal.[3]

Here, Jones's new counsel appeared in time to file a timely notice of appeal, but did so without first filing a motion for new trial or otherwise demanding an evidentiary hearing on any claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.[4] Consequently, Jones's ineffective assistance claim is procedurally barred.[5]

Appeal dismissed.

BARNES, C.J., and JOHNSON, P.J., concur.

NOTES

[1] Glover v. State, 266 Ga. 183, 184(2), 465 S.E.2d 659 (1996).

[2] Id.

[3] Id.

[4] See Terrell v. State, 268 Ga.App. 173, 176(5), 601 S.E.2d 500 (2004).

[5] Id.; Grimes v. State, 245 Ga.App. 277, 279(3), 537 S.E.2d 720 (2000); Cf. Bridges v. State, 279 Ga. 351, 357(11), 613 S.E.2d 621 (2005) (ineffective assistance claim timely raised where appellant represented by trial counsel until after notice of appeal filed).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.